System and method of recommending policies that result in  particular reputation scores for hosts

ABSTRACT

A method provides for associating reputation scores with policies, stacks and hosts within a network and upon receiving information about a newly provisioned entity (such as a host or a stack), recommending a policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity that will result in a particular reputation score of the reputation scores. The method further includes implementing the policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/171,899, entitled “SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AND MANAGING DATACENTERS,” filed on Jun. 5, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure pertains to network analytics, and more specifically to a process of provisioning hosts and recommending policy schemes that will result in a particular reputation score for the provisioned host.

BACKGROUND

Network architectures for observing and capturing information about network traffic in a datacenter are described herein. Network traffic from a compute environment (whether from a container, VM, hardware switch, hypervisor or physical server) is captured by entities called sensors or capture agents that can be deployed in or inside different environments. Sensors export data or metadata of the observed network activity to collection agents called “collectors.” Collectors can be a group of processes running on a single machine or a cluster of machines. For the sake of simplicity, collectors can be treated as one logical entity and referred to as one collector. In actual deployment of datacenter scale, there will be more than just one collector, each responsible for handling export data from a group of sensors. Collectors are capable of doing preprocessing and analysis of the data collected from sensors. The collector is capable of sending the processed or unprocessed data to a cluster of processes responsible for analysis of network data. The entities which receive the data from the collector can be a cluster of processes, and this logical group can be considered or referred to as a “pipeline.” Note that sensors and collectors are not limited to observing and processing just network data, but can also capture other system information like currently active processes, active file handles, socket handles, status of I/O devices, memory, etc.

One challenge in an environment like that which is described above is how to manage a “reputation” of all the hosts in the system. A reputation of a host or an application can be measured by a reputation score obtained from a remote reputation server. Security software determines an access policy from a graduated set of possible access policies for the application based on the application's reputation. The security software applies the access policy to the application's request for the resource. In this way, the reputation-based system uses a graduated trust scale and a policy enforcement mechanism that restricts or grants application functionality for resource interactivity along a graduated scale.

However, current systems for managing “reputation” require an independent evaluation of the reputation of every host. The amount of processing necessary to do this can be taxing on the system. It also can be difficult for an administrator to predict a resulting reputation of a particular policy, stack or host. Accordingly, an improved manner of managing and evaluating reputations for a variety of hosts is desired.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a more particular description of the principles briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only exemplary embodiments of the disclosure and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the principles herein are described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a diagram of an example network environment;

FIG. 2A illustrates a schematic diagram of an example capturing agent deployment in a virtualized environment:

FIG. 2B illustrates a schematic diagram of an example capturing agent deployment in an example network device;

FIG. 2C illustrates a schematic diagram of an example reporting system in an example capturing agent topology;

FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of an example configuration for collecting capturing agent reports;

FIG. 4 illustrates an example method embodiment;

FIG. 5 illustrates a listing of example fields on a capturing agent report;

FIG. 6 illustrates an example network device; and

FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate example system embodiments.

DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Various embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

Overview

Within the context of the network environment described herein in which capturing agents and collectors can gather and analyze various types of information about the operation of a network, the present disclosure describes concepts related to reputation scores for various networks and how to implement policies and actions based on reputation scores. The proposed solution will address the problem outlined above with respect to how to evaluate many hosts within a system and improve the ability to predict a resulting reputation of a particular policy, stack or host.

Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or can be learned by practice of the herein disclosed principles. The features and advantages of the disclosure can be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or can be learned by the practice of the principles set forth herein.

Disclosed are systems, methods, and computer-readable storage media for associating reputation scores with policies, stacks and hosts within a network and, upon receiving information about a newly provisioned entity (such as a host or a stack), recommending a policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity that will result in a particular reputation score of the reputation scores. The method further includes implementing the policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity.

The method also includes, when the particular reputation score of the newly provisioned entity falls below a threshold amount, isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network. After isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network, the system can analyze traffic from other hosts similar to the newly provisioned entity with increased scrutiny. The result could be a modification of one of a policy scheme and/or a reputation score for the other hosts that are similar in one or more ways to the newly provisioned entity. In one aspect, isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network can further include removing the newly provisioned entity from the network.

Multiple policies can result in the particular reputation score. Further, when the multiple policies result in the particular reputation score, the policy scheme that is recommended can be, in one example, a least restrictive policy of the multiply policies. In another aspect, where multiple policies are associated with a particular reputation score such that one of the multiple policies should be chosen to apply to the newly provisioned entity, then the system can choose perhaps the most restrictive policy based on one or more factors such as a predicated evolution of the reputation score for that newly provisioned entity (i.e., other entities in the same network started out with the same reputation score but it over time was evaluated to get better or worse.) A policy could be chosen with a goal in mind of maintaining the stability of the reputation score for the newly provisioned entity. Further, the system could perhaps evaluate the multiple policies associated with the reputation score and create a new policy from scratch or from blending components of other policies to create a blended policy which would apply to the newly provisioned entity.

If a system is sharing reputation data to other systems outside of a secure network, then the information provided can remove proprietary data and confidential information and just share generic reputation data.

DESCRIPTION

The disclosed technology addresses the need in the art for using calculated reputations scores for a variety of hosts and how to implement policies that result in favorable reputation scores. A description of an example network environment, as illustrated in FIG. 1, is first disclosed herein. A discussion of capturing agents will then follow. The disclosure continues with a discussion of the specific process for associating reputation scores with various policies, stacks and hosts and how the association can affect policies applied to newly provisioned hosts. The proposed concepts improve the ability of the system to manage the reputations of various hosts throughout the network and reduce the amount of processing necessary to manage the reputations of many nodes. The discussion then concludes with a description of example systems and devices. These variations shall be described herein as the various embodiments are set forth.

The system disclosed herein introduces the concept of “reputation” or a “vulnerability index” for a host in a datacenter or any compute environment. The reputation score or vulnerability index can be helpful for a variety of use cases, such as enabling conditional policies based on reputation/vulnerability, separating malicious versus non-malicious behavior, and determining effectiveness of policies, and targeting and implementing policies for specific application or service endpoint groups (EPGs) in a software-defined network (SDN), among other examples. In one example, a host can have a “Good,” “OK,” or “Bad” reputation, although there can be more or fewer classifications in other embodiments. A reputation score can be calculated and can include a numerical value within a predefined scale. The scale can be, for example, from low reputation (say with a value of −3) to a high reputation (say with a value of +3). The reputation score can also be a letter (A, B, or C) or a particular character, and so forth. The reputation score for a particular application is a measure of the application's trustworthiness, as determined by the reputation-based system. In one aspect, the reputation module obtains the application's reputation score from the reputation server 160, which maintains reputation scores for a plurality of applications or EPGs as described herein.

Further, thresholds for the classifications can be configured by the user based on, for example, preferences, service level agreements (SLAs), sensitivity of services provided by the associated applications, privacy or security expectations or requirements, etc. Reputations or vulnerabilities can be quantified for hosts in a data center. For example, a host may be designated as “Good” if it has a reputation between 0.7 and 1 (assuming a reputation scale of −1 to 1), “OK” if it has a reputation less than 0.7 but greater than 0, and “Bad” if it has a negative reputation. The reputation score can be calculated exclusively from analysis of network traffic or activity in a data center. The network data can be obtained through the sensor/collector system and at one or more layers within the network (e.g., underlay and overlay; a physical layer and one or more virtual layers such as a container layer, a hypervisor layer, a virtual machine layer, etc.). But the system can also leverage external sources for further enhancing reputation scores. For example, the system can crawl malware trackers (e.g., https://zeustracker.abuse.ch/monitor.php?filter-all), which identify IP addresses that have been infected by particular malware.

The reputation of a host in a data center can be reduced if that host has communicated with an external host that has been infected by malware. The system can also crawl a “whois” database or request to determine what IP addresses have been properly allocated to legitimate entities. If a host in a data center is communicating with an unallocated IP address, the system can reduce the reputation of that host. For example, the reputation score may be dropped from 0.8 to 0.2 if that host starts communicating with a questionable entity. The reputation of a host can also be reduced if that host has communicated with an entity in a certain “high risk” geographic location (e.g., countries or jurisdictions having higher statistical numbers of originating hacking events, etc.). The high-risk location can be defined by actual network activity in and out of the location or can be a political decision such as when a government defines a location to be high risk independent of actual network data.

Reputation scores or vulnerability indexes can be derived from external sources, such as malware trackers or whois and optionally can utilize that data with travel data. Reputation scores can also be identified, established and/or tracked using capture agents positioned within the various layers of a network as disclosed herein. In other words, the selection of reputation scores and tracking of reputations for devices can be based on capture agents configured in a device hardware layer 104 _(A), a hypervisor layer 108 _(A), and/or a virtual machine layer 110 _(A).

The disclosure now turns to FIG. 1. The various figures and description herein of capturing agents, collectors and so forth can provide the underlying data for calculating reputation scores, predicting reputation scores, or modifying or adjusting reputation scores for a policy, host or stack. Accordingly, the disclosure of these components can be combined with the particular discussion of reputation scores. FIG. 1 illustrates a diagram of example network environment 100. Fabric 112 can represent the underlay (i.e., physical network) of network environment 100. Fabric 112 can include spine routers 1-N (102 _(A-N)) (collectively “102”) and leaf routers 1-N (104 _(A-N)) (collectively “104”). Leaf routers 104 can reside at the edge of fabric 112, and can thus represent the physical network edges. Leaf routers 104 can be, for example, top-of-rack (“ToR”) switches, aggregation switches, gateways, ingress and/or egress switches, provider edge devices, and/or any other type of routing or switching device. The various data that can be collected as part of the network can be used to determine reputation scores and how to implement policies, isolate hosts where necessary and so forth.

Leaf routers 104 can be responsible for routing and/or bridging tenant or endpoint packets and applying network policies. Spine routers 102 can perform switching and routing within fabric 112. Thus, network connectivity in fabric 112 can flow from spine routers 102 to leaf routers 104, and vice versa.

Leaf routers 104 can provide servers 1-4 (106 _(A-D)) (collectively “106”), hypervisors 1-3 (108 _(A)-108 c) (collectively “108”), virtual machines (VMs) 1-4 (110 _(A)-110 _(D)) (collectively “110”), collectors 118, engines 120, and the Layer 2 (L2) network access to fabric 112. For example, leaf routers 104 can encapsulate and decapsulate packets to and from servers 106 in order to enable communications throughout environment 100. Leaf routers 104 can also connect other network-capable device(s) or network(s), such as a firewall, a database, a server, etc., to the fabric 112. Leaf routers 104 can also provide any other servers, resources, endpoints, external networks, VMs, services, tenants, or workloads with access to fabric 112.

VMs 110 can be virtual machines hosted by hypervisors 108 running on servers 106. VMs 110 can include workloads running on a guest operating system on a respective server. Hypervisors 108 can provide a layer of software, firmware, and/or hardware that creates and runs the VMs 110. Hypervisors 108 can allow VMs 110 to share hardware resources on servers 106, and the hardware resources on servers 106 to appear as multiple, separate hardware platforms. Moreover, hypervisors 108 and servers 106 can host one or more VMs 110. For example, server 106 _(A) and hypervisor 108 _(A) can host VMs 110 _(A-B).

In some cases, VMs 110 and/or hypervisors 108 can be migrated to other servers 106. For example, VM 110 _(A) can be migrated to server 106 _(C) and hypervisor 108 _(B). Servers 106 can similarly be migrated to other locations in network environment 100. For example, a server connected to a specific leaf router can be changed to connect to a different or additional leaf router. In some cases, some or all of servers 106, hypervisors 108, and/or VMs 110 can represent tenant space. Tenant space can include workloads, services, applications, devices, and/or resources that are associated with one or more clients or subscribers. Accordingly, traffic in network environment 100 can be routed based on specific tenant policies, spaces, agreements, configurations, etc. Moreover, addressing can vary between one or more tenants. In some configurations, tenant spaces can be divided into logical segments and/or networks and separated from logical segments and/or networks associated with other tenants.

Any of leaf routers 104, servers 106, hypervisors 108, and VMs 110 can include capturing agent 116 (also referred to as a “sensor” or a “capturing agent”) configured to capture network data, and report any portion of the captured data to collector 118. Capturing agents 116 can be processes, agents, modules, drivers, or components deployed on a respective system or system layer (e.g., a server, VM, virtual container, hypervisor, leaf router, etc.), configured to capture network data for the respective system (e.g., data received or transmitted by the respective system), and report some or all of the captured data and statistics to collector 118.

For example, a VM capturing agent can run as a process, kernel module, software element, or kernel driver on the guest operating system installed in a VM and configured to capture and report data (e.g., network and/or system data) processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by the VM.

A hypervisor capturing agent can run as a process, kernel module, software element, or kernel driver on the host operating system installed at the hypervisor layer and configured to capture and report data (e.g., network and/or system data) processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by the hypervisor.

A container capturing agent can run as a process, kernel module, software element, or kernel driver on the operating system of a device, such as a switch or server, which can be configured to capture and report data processed by the container.

A server capturing agent can run as a process, kernel module, software element, or kernel driver on the host operating system of a server and configured to capture and report data (e.g., network and/or system data) processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by the server.

A network device capturing agent can run as a process, software element, or component in a network device, such as leaf routers 104, and configured to capture and report data (e.g., network and/or system data) processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by the network device.

Capturing agents 116 can be configured to report observed data, statistics, and/or metadata about one or more packets, flows, communications, processes, events, and/or activities to collector 118. For example, capturing agents 116 can capture network data and statistics processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, dropped, forwarded, etc.) by the system or host (e.g., server, hypervisor, VM, container, switch, etc.) of the capturing agents 116 (e.g., where the capturing agents 116 are deployed). The capturing agents 116 can also report the network data and statistics to one or more devices, such as collectors 118 and/or engines 120. For example, the capturing agents 116 can report an amount of traffic processed by their host, a frequency of the traffic processed by their host, a type of traffic processed (e.g., sent, received, generated, etc.) by their host, a source or destination of the traffic processed by their host, a pattern in the traffic, an amount of traffic dropped or blocked by their host, types of requests or data in the traffic received, discrepancies in traffic (e.g., spoofed addresses, invalid addresses, hidden sender, etc.), protocols used in communications, type or characteristics of responses to traffic by the hosts of the capturing agents 116, what processes have triggered specific packets, etc.

Capturing agents 116 can also capture and report information about the system or host of the capturing agents 116 (e.g., type of host, type of environment, status of host, conditions of the host, etc.). Such information can include, for example, data or metadata of active or previously active processes of the system, operating system user identifiers, kernel modules loaded or used, network software characteristics (e.g., software switch, virtual network card, etc.), metadata of files on the system, system alerts, number and/or identity of applications at the host, domain information, networking information (e.g., address, topology, settings, connectivity, etc.), session information (e.g., session identifier), faults or errors, memory or CPU usage, threads, filename and/or path, services, security information or settings, and so forth.

Capturing agents 116 may also analyze the processes running on the respective VMs, hypervisors, servers, or network devices to determine specifically which process is responsible for a particular flow of network traffic. Similarly, capturing agents 116 may determine which operating system user (e.g., root, system, John Doe, Admin, etc.) is responsible for a given flow. Reported data from capturing agents 116 can provide details or statistics particular to one or more tenants or customers. For example, reported data from a subset of capturing agents 116 deployed throughout devices or elements in a tenant space can provide information about the performance, use, quality, events, processes, security status, characteristics, statistics, patterns, conditions, configurations, topology, and/or any other information for the particular tenant space.

Collectors 118 can be one or more devices, modules, workloads, VMs, containers, and/or processes capable of receiving data from capturing agents 116. Collectors 118 can thus collect reports and data from capturing agents 116. Collectors 118 can be deployed anywhere in network environment 100 and/or even on remote networks capable of communicating with network environment 100. For example, one or more collectors can be deployed within fabric 112, on the L2 network, or on one or more of the servers 106, VMs 110, hypervisors. Collectors 118 can be hosted on a server or a cluster of servers, for example. In some cases, collectors 118 can be implemented in one or more servers in a distributed fashion.

As previously noted, collectors 118 can include one or more collectors. Moreover, a collector can be configured to receive reported data from all capturing agents 116 or a subset of capturing agents 116. For example, a collector can be assigned to a subset of capturing agents 116 so the data received by that specific collector is limited to data from the subset of capturing agents 116. Collectors 118 can be configured to aggregate data from all capturing agents 116 and/or a subset of capturing agents 116. Further, collectors 118 can be configured to analyze some or all of the data reported by capturing agents 116.

Environment 100 can include one or more analytics engines 120 configured to analyze the data reported to collectors 118. For example, engines 120 can be configured to receive collected data from collectors 118, aggregate the data, analyze the data (individually and/or aggregated), generate reports, identify conditions, compute statistics, visualize reported data, troubleshoot conditions, visualize the network and/or portions of the network (e.g., a tenant space), generate alerts, identify patterns, calculate misconfigurations, identify errors, generate suggestions, generate testing, detect compromised elements (e.g., capturing agents 116, devices, servers, switches, etc.), and/or perform any other analytics functions.

Engines 120 can include one or more modules or software programs for performing such analytics. Further, engines 120 can reside on one or more servers, devices, VMs, nodes, etc. For example, engines 120 can be separate VMs or servers, an individual VM or server, or a cluster of servers or applications. Engines 120 can reside within the fabric 112, within the L2 network, outside of the environment 100 (e.g., WAN 114), in one or more segments or networks coupled with the fabric 112 (e.g., overlay network coupled with the fabric 112), etc. Engines 120 can be coupled with the fabric 112 via the leaf switches 104, for example.

While collectors 118 and engines 120 are shown as separate entities, this is simply a non-limiting example for illustration purposes, as other configurations are also contemplated herein. For example, any of collectors 118 and engines 120 can be part of a same or separate entity. Moreover, any of the collector, aggregation, and analytics functions can be implemented by one entity (e.g., a collector 118 or engine 120) or separately implemented by multiple entities (e.g., engines 120 and/or collectors 118).

Each of the capturing agents 116 can use a respective address (e.g., internet protocol (IP) address, port number, etc.) of their host to send information to collectors 118 and/or any other destination. Collectors 118 may also be associated with their respective addresses such as IP addresses. Moreover, capturing agents 116 can periodically send information about flows they observe to collectors 118. Capturing agents 116 can be configured to report each and every flow they observe or a subset of flows they observe. For example, capturing agents 116 can report every flow always, every flow within a period of time, every flow at one or more intervals, or a subset of flows during a period of time or at one or more intervals.

Capturing agents 116 can report a list of flows that were active during a period of time (e.g., between the current time and the time of the last report). The consecutive periods of time of observance can be represented as pre-defined or adjustable time series. The series can be adjusted to a specific level of granularity. Thus, the time periods can be adjusted to control the level of details in statistics and can be customized based on specific requirements or conditions, such as security, scalability, bandwidth, storage, etc. The time series information can also be implemented to focus on more important flows or components (e.g., VMs) by varying the time intervals. The communication channel between a capturing agent and collector 118 can also create a flow in every reporting interval. Thus, the information transmitted or reported by capturing agents 116 can also include information about the flow created by the communication channel.

When referring to a capturing agent's host herein, the host can refer to the physical device or component hosting the capturing agent (e.g., server, networking device, ASIC, etc.), the virtualized environment hosting the capturing agent (e.g., hypervisor, virtual machine, etc.), the operating system hosting the capturing agent (e.g., guest operating system, host operating system, etc.), and/or system layer hosting the capturing agent (e.g., hardware layer, operating system layer, hypervisor layer, virtual machine layer, etc.).

FIG. 2A illustrates a schematic diagram of an example capturing agent deployment 200 in a server 106 _(A). Server 106 _(A) can execute and host one or more VMs 110 _(A-N) (collectively “110”). VMs 110 can be configured to run workloads (e.g., applications, services, processes, functions, etc.) based on hardware resources 210 on server 106 _(A). VMs 110 can run on guest operating systems 204 _(A-N) (collectively “204”) on a virtual operating platform provided by hypervisor 108 _(A). Each VM 110 can run a respective guest operating system 204 which can be the same or different as other guest operating systems 204 associated with other VMs 110 on server 106 _(A). Each of guest operating systems 204 can execute one or more processes, which may in turn be programs, applications, modules, drivers, services, widgets, etc. Moreover, each VM 110 can have one or more network addresses, such as an internet protocol (IP) address. VMs 110 can thus communicate with hypervisor 108 _(A), server 106 _(A), and/or any remote devices or networks using the one or more network addresses.

Hypervisor 108 _(A) (otherwise known as a virtual machine manager or monitor) can be a layer of software, firmware, and/or hardware that creates and runs VMs 110. Guest operating systems 204 running on VMs 110 can share virtualized hardware resources created by hypervisor 108 _(A). The virtualized hardware resources can provide the illusion of separate hardware components. Moreover, the virtualized hardware resources can perform as physical hardware components (e.g., memory, storage, processor, network interface, peripherals, etc.), and can be driven by hardware resources 210 on server 106 _(A). Hypervisor 108 _(A) can have one or more network addresses, such as an internet protocol (IP) address, to communicate with other devices, components, or networks. For example, hypervisor 108 _(A) can have a dedicated IP address which it can use to communicate with VMs 110, server 106 _(A), and/or any remote devices or networks.

Hypervisor 108 _(A) can be assigned a network address, such as an IP, with a global scope. For example, hypervisor 108 _(A) can have an IP that can be reached or seen by VMs 110 _(A-N) as well any other devices in the network environment 100 illustrated in FIG. 1. On the other hand, VMs 110 can have a network address, such as an IP, with a local scope. For example, VM 110 _(A) can have an IP that is within a local network segment where VM 110 _(A) resides and/or which may not be directly reached or seen from other network segments in the network environment 100.

Hardware resources 210 of server 106 _(A) can provide the underlying physical hardware that drive operations and functionalities provided by server 106 _(A), hypervisor 108 _(A), and VMs 110. Hardware resources 210 can include, for example, one or more memory resources, one or more storage resources, one or more communication interfaces, one or more processors, one or more circuit boards, one or more buses, one or more extension cards, one or more power supplies, one or more antennas, one or more peripheral components, etc.

Server 106 _(A) can also include one or more host operating systems (not shown). The number of host operating systems can vary by configuration. For example, some configurations can include a dual boot configuration that allows server 106 _(A) to boot into one of multiple host operating systems. In other configurations, server 106 _(A) may run a single host operating system. Host operating systems can run on hardware resources 210. In some cases, hypervisor 108 _(A) can run on, or utilize, a host operating system on server 106 _(A). Each of the host operating systems can execute one or more processes, which may be programs, applications, modules, drivers, services, widgets, etc.

Server 106 _(A) Can also have one or more network addresses, such as an IP address, to communicate with other devices, components, or networks. For example, server 106 _(A) can have an IP address assigned to a communications interface from hardware resources 210, which it can use to communicate with VMs 110, hypervisor 108 _(A), leaf router 104 _(A) in FIG. 1, collectors 118 in FIG. 1, and/or any remote devices or networks.

VM capturing agents 202 _(A-N) (collectively “202”) can be deployed on one or more of VMs 110. VM capturing agents 202 can be data and packet inspection agents or sensors deployed on VMs 110 to capture packets, flows, processes, events, traffic, and/or any data flowing into, out of, or through VMs 110. VM capturing agents 202 can be configured to export or report any data collected or captured by the capturing agents 202 to a remote entity, such as collectors 118, for example. VM capturing agents 202 can communicate or report such data using a network address of the respective VMs 110 (e.g., VM IP address).

VM capturing agents 202 can capture and report any traffic (e.g., packets, flows, etc.) sent, received, generated, and/or processed by VMs 110. For example, capturing agents 202 can report every packet or flow of communication sent and received by VMs 110. Such communication channel between capturing agents 202 and collectors 108 creates a flow in every monitoring period or interval and the flow generated by capturing agents 202 may be denoted as a control flow. Moreover, any communication sent or received by VMs 110, including data reported from capturing agents 202, can create a network flow. VM capturing agents 202 can report such flows in the form of a control flow to a remote device, such as collectors 118 illustrated in FIG. 1.

VM capturing agents 202 can report each flow separately or aggregated with other flows. When reporting a flow via a control flow, VM capturing agents 202 can include a capturing agent identifier that identifies capturing agents 202 as reporting the associated flow. VM capturing agents 202 can also include in the control flow a flow identifier, an IP address, a timestamp, metadata, a process ID, an OS username associated with the process ID, a host or environment descriptor (e.g., type of software bridge or virtual network card, type of host such as a hypervisor or VM, etc.), and any other information, as further described below. In addition, capturing agents 202 can append the process and user information (i.e., which process and/or user is associated with a particular flow) to the control flow. The additional information as identified above can be applied to the control flow as labels. Alternatively, the additional information can be included as part of a header, a trailer, or a payload.

VM capturing agents 202 can also report multiple flows as a set of flows. When reporting a set of flows, VM capturing agents 202 can include a flow identifier for the set of flows and/or a flow identifier for each flow in the set of flows. VM capturing agents 202 can also include one or more timestamps and other information as previously explained.

VM capturing agents 202 can run as a process, kernel module, or kernel driver on guest operating systems 204 of VMs 110. VM capturing agents 202 can thus monitor any traffic sent, received, or processed by VMs 110, any processes running on guest operating systems 204, any users and user activities on guest operating system 204, any workloads on VMs 110, etc.

Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can be deployed on hypervisor 108 _(A). Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can be a data inspection agent or sensor deployed on hypervisor 108 _(A) to capture traffic (e.g., packets, flows, etc.) and/or data flowing through hypervisor 108 _(A). Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can be configured to export or report any data collected or captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206 to a remote entity, such as collectors 118, for example. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can communicate or report such data using a network address of hypervisor 108 _(A), such as an IP address of hypervisor 108 _(A).

Because hypervisor 108 _(A) can see traffic and data originating from VMs 110, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also capture and report any data (e.g., traffic data) associated with VMs 110. For example, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report every packet or flow of communication sent or received by VMs 110 and/or VM capturing agents 202. Moreover, any communication sent or received by hypervisor 108 _(A), including data reported from hypervisor capturing agent 206, can create a network flow. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report such flows in the form of a control flow to a remote device, such as collectors 118 illustrated in FIG. 1. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report each flow separately and/or in combination with other flows or data.

When reporting a flow, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can include a capturing agent identifier that identifies hypervisor capturing agent 206 as reporting the flow. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also include in the control flow a flow identifier, an IP address, a timestamp, metadata, a process ID, and any other information, as explained below. In addition, capturing agents 206 can append the process and user information (i.e., which process and/or user is associated with a particular flow) to the control flow. The additional information as identified above can be applied to the control flow as labels. Alternatively, the additional information can be included as part of a header, a trailer, or a payload.

Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also report multiple flows as a set of flows. When reporting a set of flows, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can include a flow identifier for the set of flows and/or a flow identifier for each flow in the set of flows. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also include one or more timestamps and other information as previously explained, such as process and user information.

As previously explained, any communication captured or reported by VM capturing agents 202 can flow through hypervisor 108 _(A). Thus, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can observe and capture any flows or packets reported by VM capturing agents 202, including any control flows. Accordingly, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also report any packets or flows reported by VM capturing agents 202 and any control flows generated by VM capturing agents 202. For example, VM capturing agent 202 _(A) on VM 1 (110 _(A)) captures flow 1 (“F1”) and reports F1 to collector 118 on FIG. 1. Hypervisor capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108 _(A) can also see and capture F1, as F1 would traverse hypervisor 108 _(A) when being sent or received by VM 1 (110 _(A)). Accordingly, hypervisor capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108 _(A) can also report F1 to collector 118. Thus, collector 118 can receive a report of F1 from VM capturing agent 202 _(A) on VM 1 (110 _(A)) and another report of F1 from hypervisor capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108 _(A).

When reporting F1, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report F1 as a message or report that is separate from the message or report of F1 transmitted by VM capturing agent 202 _(A) on VM 1 (110 _(A)). However, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can also, or otherwise, report F1 as a message or report that includes or appends the message or report of F1 transmitted by VM capturing agent 202 _(A) on VM 1 (110 _(A)). In other words, hypervisor capturing agent 206 can report F1 as a separate message or report from VM capturing agent 202 _(A)'s message or report of F1, and/or a same message or report that includes both a report of F1 by hypervisor capturing agent 206 and the report of F1 by VM capturing agent 202 _(A) at VM 1 (110 _(A)). In this way, VM capturing agents 202 at VMs 110 can report packets or flows received or sent by VMs 110, and hypervisor capturing agent 206 at hypervisor 108 _(A) can report packets or flows received or sent by hypervisor 108 _(A), including any flows or packets received or sent by VMs 110 and/or reported by VM capturing agents 202.

Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can run as a process, kernel module, or kernel driver on the host operating system associated with hypervisor 108 _(A). Hypervisor capturing agent 206 can thus monitor any traffic sent and received by hypervisor 108 _(A), any processes associated with hypervisor 108 _(A), etc.

Server 106 _(A) can also have server capturing agent 208 running on it. Server capturing agent 208 can be a data inspection agent or sensor deployed on server 106 _(A) to capture data (e.g., packets, flows, traffic data, etc.) on server 106 _(A). Server capturing agent 208 can be configured to export or report any data collected or captured by server capturing agent 206 to a remote entity, such as collector 118, for example. Server capturing agent 208 can communicate or report such data using a network address of server 106 _(A), such as an IP address of server 106 _(A).

Server capturing agent 208 can capture and report any packet or flow of communication associated with server 106 _(A). For example, capturing agent 208 can report every packet or flow of communication sent or received by one or more communication interfaces of server 106 _(A). Moreover, any communication sent or received by server 106 _(A), including data reported from capturing agents 202 and 206, can create a network flow associated with server 106 _(A). Server capturing agent 208 can report such flows in the form of a control flow to a remote device, such as collector 118 illustrated in FIG. 1. Server capturing agent 208 can report each flow separately or in combination. When reporting a flow, server capturing agent 208 can include a capturing agent identifier that identifies server capturing agent 208 as reporting the associated flow. Server capturing agent 208 can also include in the control flow a flow identifier, an IP address, a timestamp, metadata, a process ID, and any other information. In addition, capturing agent 208 can append the process and user information (i.e., which process and/or user is associated with a particular flow) to the control flow. The additional information as identified above can be applied to the control flow as labels. Alternatively, the additional information can be included as part of a header, a trailer, or a payload.

Server capturing agent 208 can also report multiple flows as a set of flows. When reporting a set of flows, server capturing agent 208 can include a flow identifier for the set of flows and/or a flow identifier for each flow in the set of flows. Server capturing agent 208 can also include one or more timestamps and other information as previously explained.

Any communications captured or reported by capturing agents 202 and 206 can flow through server 106 _(A). Thus, server capturing agent 208 can observe or capture any flows or packets reported by capturing agents 202 and 206. In other words, network data observed by capturing agents 202 and 206 inside VMs 110 and hypervisor 108 _(A) can be a subset of the data observed by server capturing agent 208 on server 106 _(A). Accordingly, server capturing agent 208 can report any packets or flows reported by capturing agents 202 and 206 and any control flows generated by capturing agents 202 and 206. For example, capturing agent 202 _(A) on VM 1 (110 _(A)) captures flow 1 (F1) and reports F1 to collector 118 as illustrated on FIG. 1. Capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108 _(A) can also observe and capture F1, as F1 would traverse hypervisor 108 _(A) when being sent or received by VM 1 (110 _(A)). In addition, capturing agent 206 on server 106 _(A) can also see and capture F1, as F1 would traverse server 106 _(A) when being sent or received by VM 1 (110 _(A)) and hypervisor 108 _(A). Accordingly, capturing agent 208 can also report F1 to collector 118. Thus, collector 118 can receive a report (i.e., control flow) regarding F1 from capturing agent 202 _(A) on VM 1 (110 _(A)), capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108 _(A), and capturing agent 208 on server 106 _(A).

When reporting F1, server capturing agent 208 can report F1 as a message or report that is separate from any messages or reports of F1 transmitted by capturing agent 202 _(A) on VM 1 (110 _(A)) or capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108 _(A). However, server capturing agent 208 can also, or otherwise, report F1 as a message or report that includes or appends the messages or reports or metadata of F1 transmitted by capturing agent 202 _(A) on VM 1 (110 _(A)) and capturing agent 206 on hypervisor 108 _(A). In other words, server capturing agent 208 can report F1 as a separate message or report from the messages or reports of F1 from capturing agent 202 _(A) and capturing agent 206, and/or a same message or report that includes a report of F1 by capturing agent 202 _(A), capturing agent 206, and capturing agent 208. In this way, capturing agents 202 at VMs 110 can report packets or flows received or sent by VMs 110, capturing agent 206 at hypervisor 108 _(A) can report packets or flows received or sent by hypervisor 108 _(A), including any flows or packets received or sent by VMs 110 and reported by capturing agents 202, and capturing agent 208 at server 106 _(A) can report packets or flows received or sent by server 106 _(A), including any flows or packets received or sent by VMs 110 and reported by capturing agents 202, and any flows or packets received or sent by hypervisor 108 _(A) and reported by capturing agent 206.

Server capturing agent 208 can run as a process, kernel module, or kernel driver on the host operating system or a hardware component of server 106 _(A). Server capturing agent 208 can thus monitor any traffic sent and received by server 106 _(A), any processes associated with server 106 _(A), etc.

In addition to network data, capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can capture additional information about the system or environment in which they reside. For example, capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can capture data or metadata of active or previously active processes of their respective system or environment, operating system user identifiers, metadata of files on their respective system or environment, timestamps, network addressing information, flow identifiers, capturing agent identifiers, etc. Capturing agents 202, 206, and 208

Moreover, capturing agents 202, 206, 208 are not specific to any operating system environment, hypervisor environment, network environment, or hardware environment. Thus, capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can operate in any environment.

As previously explained, capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can send information about the network traffic they observe. This information can be sent to one or more remote devices, such as one or more servers, collectors, engines, etc. Each capturing agent can be configured to send respective information using a network address, such as an IP address, and any other communication details, such as port number, to one or more destination addresses or locations. Capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can send metadata about one or more flows, packets, communications, processes, events, etc.

Capturing agents 202, 206, and 208 can periodically report information about each flow or packet they observe. The information reported can contain a list of flows or packets that were active during a period of time (e.g., between the current time and the time at which the last information was reported). The communication channel between the capturing agent and the destination can create a flow in every interval. For example, the communication channel between capturing agent 208 and collector 118 can create a control flow. Thus, the information reported by a capturing agent can also contain information about this control flow. For example, the information reported by capturing agent 208 to collector 118 can include a list of flows or packets that were active at hypervisor 108 _(A) during a period of time, as well as information about the communication channel between capturing agent 206 and collector 118 used to report the information by capturing agent 206.

FIG. 2B illustrates a schematic diagram of example capturing agent deployment 220 in an example network device. The network device is described as leaf router 104 _(A), as illustrated in FIG. 1. However, this is for explanation purposes. The network device can be any other network device, such as any other switch, router, etc.

In this example, leaf router 104 _(A) can include network resources 222, such as memory, storage, communication, processing, input, output, and other types of resources. Leaf router 104 _(A) can also include operating system environment 224. The operating system environment 224 can include any operating system, such as a network operating system, embedded operating system, etc. Operating system environment 224 can include processes, functions, and applications for performing networking, routing, switching, forwarding, policy implementation, messaging, monitoring, and other types of operations.

Leaf router 104 _(A) Can also include capturing agent 226. Capturing agent 226 can be an agent or sensor configured to capture network data, such as flows or packets, sent received, or processed by leaf router 104 _(A). Capturing agent 226 can also be configured to capture other information, such as processes, statistics, users, alerts, status information, device information, etc. Moreover, capturing agent 226 can be configured to report captured data to a remote device or network, such as collector 118 shown in FIG. 1, for example. Capturing agent 226 can report information using one or more network addresses associated with leaf router 104 _(A) or collector 118. For example, capturing agent 226 can be configured to report information using an IP assigned to an active communications interface on leaf router 104 _(A).

Leaf router 104 _(A) can be configured to route traffic to and from other devices or networks, such as server 106 _(A). Accordingly, capturing agent 226 can also report data reported by other capturing agents on other devices. For example, leaf router 104 _(A) can be configured to route traffic sent and received by server 106 _(A) to other devices. Thus, data reported from capturing agents deployed on server 106 _(A), such as VM and hypervisor capturing agents on server 106 _(A), would also be observed by capturing agent 226 and can thus be reported by capturing agent 226 as data observed at leaf router 104 _(A). Such report can be a control flow generated by capturing agent 226. Data reported by the VM and hypervisor capturing agents on server 106 _(A) can therefore be a subset of the data reported by capturing agent 226.

Capturing agent 226 can run as a process or component (e.g., firmware, module, hardware device, etc.) in leaf router 104 _(A). Moreover, capturing agent 226 can be installed on leaf router 104 _(A) as a software or firmware agent. In some configurations, leaf router 104 _(A) itself can act as capturing agent 226. Moreover, capturing agent 226 can run within operating system 224 and/or separate from operating system 224.

FIG. 2C illustrates a schematic diagram of example reporting system 240 in an example capturing agent topology. The capturing agent topology includes capturing agents along a path from a virtualized environment (e.g., VM and hypervisor) to the fabric 112.

Leaf router 104 _(A) can route packets or traffic 242 between fabric 112 and server 106 _(A), hypervisor 108 _(A), and VM 110 _(A). Packets or traffic 242 between VM 110 _(A) and leaf router 104 _(A) can flow through hypervisor 108 _(A) and server 106 _(A). Packets or traffic 242 between hypervisor 108 _(A) and leaf router 104 _(A) can flow through server 106 _(A). Finally, packets or traffic 242 between server 106 _(A) and leaf router 104 _(A) can flow directly to leaf router 104 _(A). However, in some cases, packets or traffic 242 between server 106 _(A) and leaf router 104 _(A) can flow through one or more intervening devices or networks, such as a switch or a firewall.

Moreover, VM capturing agent 202 _(A) at VM 110 _(A), hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A) at hypervisor 108 _(A), network device capturing agent 226 at leaf router 104 _(A), and any server capturing agent at server 106 _(A) (e.g., capturing agent running on host environment of server 106 _(A)) can send reports 244 (also referred to as control flows) to collector 118 based on the packets or traffic 242 captured at each respective capturing agent. Reports 244 from VM capturing agent 202 _(A) to collector 118 can flow through VM 110 _(A), hypervisor 108 _(A), server 106 _(A), and leaf router 104 _(A). Reports 244 from hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A) to collector 118 can flow through hypervisor 108 _(A), server 106 _(A), and leaf router 104 _(A). Reports 244 from any other server capturing agent at server 106 _(A) to collector 118 can flow through server 106 _(A) and leaf router 104 _(A). Finally, reports 244 from network device capturing agent 226 to collector 118 can flow through leaf router 104 _(A). Although reports 244 are depicted as being routed separately from traffic 242 in FIG. 2C, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that reports 244 and traffic 242 can be transmitted through the same communication channel(s).

Reports 244 can include any portion of packets or traffic 242 captured at the respective capturing agents. Reports 244 can also include other information, such as timestamps, process information, capturing agent identifiers, flow identifiers, flow statistics, notifications, logs, user information, system information, etc. Some or all of this information can be appended to reports 244 as one or more labels, metadata, or as part of the packet(s)' header, trailer, or payload. For example, if a user opens a browser on VM 110 _(A) and navigates to examplewebsite.com, VM capturing agent 202 _(A) of VM 110 _(A) can determine which user (i.e., operating system user) of VM 110 _(A) (e.g., username “johndoe85”) and which process being executed on the operating system of VM 110 _(A) (e.g., “chrome.exe”) were responsible for the particular network flow to and from examplewebsite.com. Once such information is determined, the information can be included in report 244 as labels for example, and report 244 can be transmitted from VM capturing agent 202 _(A) to collector 118. Such additional information can help system 240 to gain insight into flow information at the process and user level, for instance. This information can be used for security, optimization, and determining structures and dependencies within system 240.

In some examples, the reports 244 can include various statistics and/or usage information reported by the respective capturing agents. For example, the reports 244 can indicate an amount of traffic captured by the respective capturing agent, which can include the amount of traffic sent, received, and generated by the capturing agent's host; a type of traffic captured, such as video, audio, Web (e.g., HTTP or HTTPS), database queries, application traffic, etc.; a source and/or destination of the traffic, such as a destination server or application, a source network or device, a source or destination address or name (e.g., IP address, DNS name, FQDN, packet label, MAC address, VLAN, VNID, VxLAN, source or destination domain, etc.); a source and/or destination port (e.g., port 25, port 80, port 443, port 8080, port 22); a traffic protocol; traffic metadata; etc. The reports 244 can also include indications of traffic or usage patterns and information, such as frequency of communications, intervals, type of requests, type of responses, triggering processes or events (e.g., causality), resource usage, etc.

Each of the capturing agents 202 _(A), 206 _(A), 226 can include a respective unique capturing agent identifier on each of reports 244 it sends to collector 118, to allow collector 118 to determine which capturing agent sent the report. Capturing agent identifiers in reports 244 can also be used to determine which capturing agents reported what flows. This information can then be used to determine capturing agent placement and topology, as further described below, as well as mapping individual flows to processes and users. Such additional insights gained can be useful for analyzing the data in reports 244, as well as troubleshooting, security, visualization, configuration, planning, and management, and so forth.

As previously noted, the topology of the capturing agents can be ascertained from the reports 244. To illustrate, a packet received by VM 110 _(A) from fabric 112 can be captured and reported by VM capturing agent 202 _(A). Since the packet received by VM 110 _(A) will also flow through leaf router 104 _(A) and hypervisor 108 _(A), it can also be captured and reported by hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A) and network device capturing agent 226. Thus, for a packet received by VM 110 _(A) from fabric 112, collector 118 can receive a report of the packet from VM capturing agent 202 _(A), hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A), and network device capturing agent 226.

Similarly, a packet sent by VM 110 _(A) to fabric 112 can be captured and reported by VM capturing agent 202 _(A). Since the packet sent by VM 110 _(A) will also flow through leaf router 104 _(A) and hypervisor 108 _(A), it can also be captured and reported by hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A) and network device capturing agent 226. Thus, for a packet sent by VM 110 _(A) to fabric 112, collector 118 can receive a report of the packet from VM capturing agent 202 _(A), hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A), and network device capturing agent 226.

On the other hand, a packet originating at, or destined to, hypervisor 108 _(A), can be captured and reported by hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A) and network device capturing agent 226, but not VM capturing agent 202 _(A), as such packet may not flow through VM 110 _(A). Moreover, a packet originating at, or destined to, leaf router 104 _(A), will be captured and reported by network device capturing agent 226, but not VM capturing agent 202 _(A), hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A), or any other capturing agent on server 106 _(A), as such packet may not flow through VM 110 _(A), hypervisor 108 _(A), or server 106 _(A).

Information ascertained or inferred about the topology of the capturing agents can also be used with the reports 244 to detect problems. For example, the inferred topology of the capturing agents can be used with the current and/or historical statistics included in the reports 244 to infer or detect various conditions. To illustrate, traffic to and from fabric 112 captured by VM capturing agent 202 should also be captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206 and network device capturing agent 226. Thus, if VM capturing agent 202 reports 200 packets to or from fabric 112 during a period of time and network device capturing agent 226 only reports 20 packets to or from fabric 112 during that same period of time, then one can infer from this discrepancy that VM capturing agent 202 has reported and/or captured an abnormal or unexpected number of packets during that period of time. This abnormal activity can be determined to indicate a faulty state of the VM capturing agent 202, such as an error, a bug, malware, a virus, or a compromised condition.

Other statistics and usage details determined from reports 244 can also be considered for determining problems or faults with capturing agents and/or hosts. For example, if hypervisor capturing agent 206 has typically reported in the past an average of 10K server hits (e.g., Web, email, database, etc.) every 7 days, and reports 244 indicate a spike of 50K server hits over the last 2 days, then one can infer that this abnormal levels of activity indicate a problem with the hypervisor capturing agent 206 and/or its host (i.e., hypervisor 108 or server 106). The abnormal levels of activity can be a result of malware or a virus affecting the hypervisor capturing agent 206.

In another example, if the reports 244 indicate that the VM capturing agent 202 has been generating unexpected, improper, or excessive traffic, such as sending packets or commands to a new or different device other than collector 118—or other than any other system with which VM capturing agent 202 is expected or configured to communicate with—or sending the wrong types of packets (e.g., other than reports 244) or sending traffic at unexpected times or events (e.g., without being triggered by a predefined setting or event such as the capturing of a packet processed by the host), then one can assume that VM capturing agent 202 has been compromised or is being manipulated by an unauthorized user or device.

Reports 244 can be transmitted to collector 118 periodically as new packets or traffic 242 are captured by a capturing agent, or otherwise based on a schedule, interval, or event, for example. Further, each capturing agent can send a single report or multiple reports to collector 118. For example, each of the capturing agents can be configured to send a report to collector 118 for every flow, packet, message, communication, or network data received, transmitted, and/or generated by its respective host (e.g., VM 110 _(A), hypervisor 108 _(A), server 106 _(A), and leaf router 104 _(A)). As such, collector 118 can receive a report of a same packet from multiple capturing agents. In other examples, one or more capturing agents can be configured to send a report to collector 118 for one or more flows, packets, messages, communications, network data, or subset(s) thereof, received, transmitted, and/or generated by the respective host during a period of time or interval.

FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of an example configuration 300 for collecting capturing agent reports (i.e., control flows). In configuration 300, traffic between fabric 112 and VM 110 _(A) is configured to flow through hypervisor 108 _(A). Moreover, traffic between fabric 112 and hypervisor 108 _(A) is configured to flow through leaf router 104 _(A).

VM capturing agent 202 _(A) can be configured to report to collector 118 traffic sent, received, or processed by VM 110 _(A). Hypervisor capturing agent 210 can be configured to report to collector 118 traffic sent, received, or processed by hypervisor 108 _(A). Finally, network device capturing agent 226 can be configured to report to collector 118 traffic sent, received, or processed by leaf router 104 _(A).

Collector 118 can thus receive flows 302 from VM capturing agent 202 _(A), flows 304 from hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A), and flows 306 from network device capturing agent 226. Flows 302, 304, and 306 can include control flows. Flows 302 can include flows captured by VM capturing agent 202 _(A) at VM 110 _(A).

Flows 304 can include flows captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A) at hypervisor 108 _(A). Flows captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A) can also include flows 302 captured by VM capturing agent 202 _(A), as traffic sent and received by VM 110 _(A) will be received and observed by hypervisor 108 _(A) and captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A).

Flows 306 can include flows captured by network device capturing agent 226 at leaf router 104 _(A). Flows captured by network device capturing agent 226 can also include flows 302 captured by VM capturing agent 202 _(A) and flows 304 captured by hypervisor capturing agent 206 _(A), as traffic sent and received by VM 110 _(A) and hypervisor 108 _(A) is routed through leaf router 104 _(A) and can thus be captured by network device capturing agent 226.

Collector 118 can collect flows 302, 304, and 306, and store the reported data. Collector 118 can also forward some or all of flows 302, 304, and 306, and/or any respective portion thereof, to engine 120. Engine 120 can process the information, including any information about the capturing agents (e.g., agent placement, agent environment, etc.) and/or the captured traffic (e.g., statistics), received from collector 118 to identify patterns, conditions, network or device characteristics; log statistics or history details; aggregate and/or process the data; generate reports, timelines, alerts, graphical user interfaces; detect errors, events, inconsistencies; troubleshoot networks or devices; configure networks or devices; deploy services or devices; reconfigure services, applications, devices, or networks; etc.

Collector 118 and/or engine 120 can map individual flows that traverse VM 110 _(A), hypervisor 108 _(A), and/or leaf router 104 _(A) to the specific capturing agents at VM 110 _(A), hypervisor 108 _(A), and/or leaf router 104 _(A). For example, collector 118 or engine 120 can determine that a particular flow that originated from VM 110 _(A) and destined for fabric 112 was sent by VM 110 _(A) and such flow was reported by VM capturing agent 202. It may be determined that the same flow was received by a process named Z on hypervisor 108 _(A) and forwarded to a process named W on leaf router 104 _(A) and also reported by hypervisor capturing agent 206.

While engine 120 is illustrated as a separate entity, other configurations are also contemplated herein. For example, engine 120 can be part of collector 118 and/or a separate entity. Indeed, engine 120 can include one or more devices, applications, modules, databases, processing components, elements, etc. Moreover, collector 118 can represent one or more collectors. For example, in some configurations, collector 118 can include multiple collection systems or entities, which can reside in one or more networks.

Having disclosed some basic system components and concepts, the disclosure now turns to the exemplary method embodiment shown in FIG. 4. For the sake of clarity, the method can be practiced by any system or implemented in any way. The example methods can be practiced by any software or hardware components, devices, etc. heretofore disclosed. The steps outlined herein are exemplary and can be implemented in any combination thereof in any order, including combinations that exclude, add, or modify certain steps.

The current disclosure implements sensors or capturing agents within various hosts and layers in a network, such as VMs, hypervisors, servers, and hardware switches, which capture data sent and received at each of these points and report the data to a collector which can process, store, aggregate, manipulate, and/or analyze the data, and maintain the reported, sensed data. The collector can transmit the collected data from each sensor to the pipeline (e.g., a particular engine), which can analyze any portion of the data and use the data to calculate, modify, or predict reputation scores for various hosts, policies, layers, EPGs, and/or stacks. The pipeline can identify such data as packet loss at each point by comparing data or packets captured and reported by capturing agents at each point. This comparison can be performed per flow, per link, per hop, per layer, per process, and/or on a host basis. The information can affect a reputation score for a respective component in the network. The collector can also analyze non-contiguous network flows as part of its process. For example, it can analyze a network flow for several disjointed periods of time and/or from different locations within the network.

In another aspect, given that capturing agents are at the different layers of the network, the system can infer a reputation score for a given entity based on network data obtained from a different layer from the layer in which the entity resides. For example, a certain packet activity might be occurring at a hypervisor layer. Knowing that activity, the system can infer something about the reputation score (vulnerability) of virtual machines in that hypervisor. Thus, if the system is to provision a virtual machine and implement a policy associated with that virtual machine so that the virtual machine has a certain reputation score, the system might in addition to assigning a policy for the virtual machine, assign, adjust or vary the policy of the hypervisor, and/or other layers in the network which can also ultimately affect the reputation score of the virtual machine.

Moreover, the pipeline can perform the comparison for data captured within a specific time window. For example, the pipeline can compare data from each point within a 30 minute time window. The pipeline can then identify packet loss or other issues such as communication with a questionable entity at each point and determine if there is a problem at a specific point within the link, path, or flow. For example, the pipeline can analyze an aggregate of data captured for a 30 minute window of communications from S1 to H1 to S2. Based on the aggregated data, the pipeline can determine that S1 reported 100% of the packets. H1 reported 90% of the packets, and S2 reported 80% of the packets. Here, the pipeline can thus determine that there is a 10% packet loss at each of H1 and S2. This data can affect a reputation score for a particular component, particularly if malware is also detected or suggested based on the processing of data.

The pipeline can also consider the frequency of communications with a particular entity, such as a high risk entity. For example, if a capturing agent at a hypervisor reports that the hypervisor had 10,000 packets sent to, or received from, a high risk entity, the pipeline can infer a reputation score representing a higher risk than if the capturing agent at the hypervisor were to report only 100 packets sent to, or received from, the high risk entity. Thus, the extent, frequency, amount, pattern, and/or characteristics of communications with a particular entity can also affect the reputation score generated.

FIG. 4 illustrates a method aspect of this disclosure. An exemplary method can be performed by a system or any computing device whether physical or virtual. The data that can be received using the sensors and collectors at the various levels of a network as disclosed herein can be useful for evaluating reputations scores. For example, understanding the type of data, the port used, whether the used port is the expected port, what level in the network the data originated from or was triggered by, which protocol is used to transmit the data between (HTTPS or HTTP), etc., can be valuable information in determining a reputation score and a security risk for any given host or entity in the network. Thus, the discussion herein with respect to policies and reputation scores can use any type of data obtainable from the multi-level sensor and collector system disclosed herein.

An example method includes associating reputation scores with policies, stacks and hosts within a network (402) and upon receiving information about a newly provisioned entity (such as a host or a stack), recommending a policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity that will result in a particular reputation score of the reputation scores (404). The method further includes implementing the policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity (408).

Reputation scores can relate to vulnerability indexes, security strength, a trust level for different types of communication with a device, and so forth. They can be derived from one or more of an external source or sources, such as malware trackers or whois, or travel data which is easy to obtain, and/or data obtained from the various layers of a network including a physical layer, a hypervisor layer and a virtual layer. Reputation scores can be identified and tracked using the various layers of capture agents disclosed herein. In other words, the selection of reputation scores and tracking of reputations for devices can be based, at least in part, on capture agents configured in a device hardware layer 104 _(A), a hypervisor layer 108 _(A), and/or a virtual machine layer 110 _(A). The data obtained from these capture agents can also be coordinated with external data or other data to arrive at a reputation score. The reputation scores can also be applied to applications and can govern what level of access they may have to particular devices/entities in a network.

With the information at the various levels, increased fine tuning can occur within provisioning and managing of new entities or existing entities. More advanced reputation score management can occur. For example, if there is a hypervisor that has a high reputation, assume that the system is about to deploy a virtual machine that might have a lower reputation. In this case, the system might determine that deploying such a virtual machine might negatively affect the desired reputation of the hypervisor and therefore select a different host for the virtual machine or might implement the virtual machine with policies to prevent it from achieving a low reputation score. Thus, the high reputation of the hypervisor can be maintained for virtual devices that are provisioned within the hypervisor. Thus, reputations for one layer of the network can be managed through control of provisioning or management of entities in a different layer. The approach can apply to higher layers or lower layers to the layer in which an entity is being provisioned.

The hypervisors will each have a virtual switch and each virtual machine can also have a virtual network interface. With the disclosure, one can analyze the behavior of these virtual switches and/or virtual network interfaces and use that data in establishing reputation scores for assignment or association with the policies.

For example, the policies may be access policies that define the circumstances in which an application can access a host. A graduated trust scale can be used to determine whether an application is granted access to the resources of a particular host. Thus, a reputation score of 0.8 (a high reputation score—for high trustworthiness) can be associated with a liberal access policy. More access is granted to the host because of its trustworthiness. In another aspect, the correlation between policies and reputation scores can operate in a different way. For example, for a high reputation (say 0.8), one might want to correlate that with a strict policy of access to a resource like a host or stack. In this manner, once the system applies the selected policy to a newly provisioned resource, its access will be more secure based on the policy—which, after the provisioned resources is in use, will result in more secure transactions and a higher resulting reputation score. Then the system can adjust the policy and determine whether the reputation score is maintained with a more relaxed policy in place.

The following is an example structure for a policy:

policy_group { id: 0 name: “forTenant0” version: 1 type: PRIMARY vrf: 0 epg { update_type: ADD address: “172.29.201.10” prefix_length: 32 id: 100 key_type: IPV4 name: “epg100” epg_adm_id: “adm100” } epg { update_type: ADD address: “172.21.157.167” prefix_length: 32 id: 110 key_type: IPV4 name: “epg110” epg_adm_id: “tet110” } policy_acl { update_time_usec: 0 update_type: ADD action: ALLOW src_epg_id: 100 dst_epg_id: 110 start_src_port: 0 end_src_port: 65536 start_dst_port: 0 end_dst_port: 65536 protocol: 6 tcp_flags: 0 policy_name: “policy_name1” contract_name: “contract_name1” subject_name: “subject_name1” filter_name: “filter_name1” label_name: “label_name1” end_time_usec: 3416441532002850 is_src_provider: false  } }

The above policy introduces an “allow” rule between endpoint group 100 and endpoint group 110 with the source and destination ports ranging from 0 to 65536. In this example policy, many ports are being allowed and thus it is a very open policy. Because of the open nature of the policy, there can be attempts to scan on multiple ports to fingerprint the operating system, application or network characteristics. If such scan or any vulnerability is exposed, then the reputation for the hosts will go down as the above policy was too open between the two endpoint groups. In such a case, the policy itself will have an overall low reputation compared to another policy which is much more tightly defined.

Multiple policies can result in the particular reputation score. Further, when the multiple policies result in the particular reputation score, the policy scheme that is recommended can be, in one example, a least restrictive policy of the multiply policies. In another aspect, where multiple policies are associated with a particular reputation score such that one of the multiple policies should be chosen to apply to the newly provisioned entity, then the system can choose perhaps the most restrictive policy based on one or more factors such as a predicated evolution of the reputation score for that newly provisioned entity (i.e., other entities in the same network started out with the same reputation score but it over time was evaluated to get better or worse.)

A policy could be chosen with a goal in mind of maintaining the stability of the reputation score for the newly provisioned entity. A policy could be chosen which is expected to have a reputation score of one value but then cause that value to increase. The system could also, based on any number of factors, choose a first policy for a period of time to run the newly provisioned entity and obtain an initial reputation score and then switch to another policy after the period of time with a goal of increasing (or decreasing) the reputation score. Further, the system could perhaps evaluated the multiple policies associated with the reputation score and create a new policy from scratch or from blending components of other policies to create a blended policy which would apply to the newly provisioned entity.

As the system monitors the reputation scores of various devices and components within a network, the system can identify one or more of policies, stacks or hosts that have extreme reputation scores—either good or bad. The system can then implement steps such as placing systems with good or exemplary reputation scores on a “white-list” or those with extremely poor reputation scores on a “black-list.” Thus, policies, stacks or hosts can be categorized in certain ways which can affect how isolated they are, or how long they will need to be on the black-list before perhaps a change in their reputation score enables a host to be removed from a black list. The system, periodically, or dynamically, evaluates reputation scores for consideration of taking further action. Typically, a more favorable reputation score equates to stronger security with respect to the system, host, policy or stack.

In one aspect, one secure network may communicate reputation score information outside of the secure network. In that case, the system can modify the reputation data in that it can contain proprietary or private information which can include information about users or a policy, host or stack. Thus, a system can evaluate whether a transmission of reputation data will occur to a recipient device outside of a secure network, and if so, the system can remove proprietary and/or confidential information from the reputation data and generate generic reputation data. This can include aggregated data for a group of hosts or can remove specific host names, user names, user data, or other identification, and so forth. The generic reputation data can then be transmitted out of the secure network. Similarly, if a network receives reputation data from a separate secure network and for some reason the received data has confidential information, the network can manipulate the data to remove the confidential information and notify the sending network of the situation.

The disclosure now continues with other data about the network and how the capturing agents and collectors operate. FIG. 5 illustrates a listing 500 of example fields on a capturing agent report. The listing 500 can include one or more fields, such as:

Flow identifier (e.g., unique identifier associated with the flow).

Capturing agent identifier (e.g., data uniquely identifying reporting capturing agent).

Timestamp (e.g., time of event, report, etc.).

Interval (e.g., time between current report and previous report, interval between flows or packets, interval between events, etc.).

Duration (e.g., duration of event, duration of communication, duration of flow, duration of report, etc.).

Flow direction (e.g., egress flow, ingress flow, etc.).

Application identifier (e.g., identifier of application associated with flow, process, event, or data).

Port (e.g., source port, destination port, layer 4 port, etc.).

Destination address (e.g., interface address associated with destination, IP address, domain name, network address, hardware address, virtual address, physical address, etc.).

Source address (e.g., interface address associated with source, IP address, domain name, network address, hardware address, virtual address, physical address, etc.).

Interface (e.g., interface address, interface information, etc.).

Protocol (e.g., layer 4 protocol, layer 3 protocol, etc.).

Event (e.g., description of event, event identifier, etc.).

Flag (e.g., layer 3 flag, flag options, etc.).

Tag (e.g., virtual local area network tag, etc.).

Process (e.g., process identifier, etc.).

User (e.g., OS username, etc.).

Bytes (e.g., flow size, packet size, transmission size, etc.).

Sensor Type (e.g., the type of virtualized environment hosting the capturing agent, such as hypervisor or VM; the type of virtual network device, such as VNIC, LINUX bridge, OVS, software switch, etc.).

The listing 500 includes a non-limiting example of fields in a report. Other fields and data items are also contemplated herein, such as handshake information, system information, network address associated with capturing agent or host, operating system environment information, network data or statistics, process statistics, system statistics, etc. The order in which these fields are illustrated is also exemplary and can be rearranged in any other way. One or more of these fields can be part of a header, a trailer, or a payload of in one or more packets. Moreover, one or more of these fields can be applied to the one or more packets as labels. Each of the fields can include data, metadata, and/or any other information relevant to the fields.

The disclosure now turns to the example network device and system illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7A-B.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example network device 610 according to some embodiments. Network device 610 includes a master central processing unit (CPU) 662, interfaces 668, and a bus 615 (e.g., a PCI bus). When acting under the control of appropriate software or firmware, the CPU 662 is responsible for executing packet management, error detection, and/or routing functions. The CPU 662 preferably accomplishes all these functions under the control of software including an operating system and any appropriate applications software. CPU 662 may include one or more processors 663 such as a processor from the Motorola family of microprocessors or the MIPS family of microprocessors. In an alternative embodiment, processor 663 is specially designed hardware for controlling the operations of router 610. In a specific embodiment, a memory 661 (such as non-volatile RAM and/or ROM) also forms part of CPU 662. However, there are many different ways in which memory could be coupled to the system.

The interfaces 668 are typically provided as interface cards (sometimes referred to as “line cards”). Generally, they control the sending and receiving of data packets over the network and sometimes support other peripherals used with the router 610. Among the interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like. In addition, various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast token ring interfaces, wireless interfaces, Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like. Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as packet switching, media control and management. By providing separate processors for the communications intensive tasks, these interfaces allow the master microprocessor 662 to efficiently perform routing computations, network diagnostics, security functions, etc.

Although the system shown in FIG. 6 is one specific network device of the present disclosure, it is by no means the only network device architecture on which the present disclosure can be implemented. For example, an architecture having a single processor that handles communications as well as routing computations, etc. is often used. Further, other types of interfaces and media could also be used with the router.

Regardless of the network device's configuration, it may employ one or more memories or memory modules (including memory 661) configured to store program instructions for the general-purpose network operations and mechanisms for roaming, route optimization and routing functions described herein. The program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. The memory or memories may also be configured to store tables such as mobility binding, registration, and association tables, etc.

FIG. 7A and FIG. 7B illustrate example system embodiments. The more appropriate embodiment will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art when practicing the present technology. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will also readily appreciate that other system embodiments are possible.

FIG. 7A illustrates a conventional system bus computing system architecture 700 wherein the components of the system are in electrical communication with each other using a bus 705. Exemplary system 700 includes a processing unit (CPU or processor) 710 and a system bus 705 that couples various system components including the system memory 715, such as read only memory (ROM) 720 and random access memory (RAM) 725, to the processor 710. The system 700 can include a cache of high-speed memory connected directly with, in close proximity to, or integrated as part of the processor 710. The system 700 can copy data from the memory 715 and/or the storage device 730 to the cache 712 for quick access by the processor 710. In this way, the cache can provide a performance boost that avoids processor 710 delays while waiting for data. These and other modules can control or be configured to control the processor 710 to perform various actions. Other system memory 715 may be available for use as well. The memory 715 can include multiple different types of memory with different performance characteristics. The processor 710 can include any general purpose processor and a hardware module or software module, such as module 1 732, module 2 734, and module 3 736 stored in storage device 730, configured to control the processor 710 as well as a special-purpose processor where software instructions are incorporated into the actual processor design. The processor 710 may essentially be a completely self-contained computing system, containing multiple cores or processors, a bus, memory controller, cache, etc. A multi-core processor may be symmetric or asymmetric.

To enable user interaction with the computing device 700, an input device 745 can represent any number of input mechanisms, such as a microphone for speech, a touch-sensitive screen for gesture or graphical input, keyboard, mouse, motion input, speech and so forth. An output device 735 can also be one or more of a number of output mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. In some instances, multimodal systems can enable a user to provide multiple types of input to communicate with the computing device 700. The communications interface 740 can generally govern and manage the user input and system output. There is no restriction on operating on any particular hardware arrangement and therefore the basic features here may easily be substituted for improved hardware or firmware arrangements as they are developed.

Storage device 730 is a non-volatile memory and can be a hard disk or other types of computer readable media which can store data that are accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, solid state memory devices, digital versatile disks, cartridges, random access memories (RAMs) 725, read only memory (ROM) 720, and hybrids thereof.

The storage device 730 can include software modules 732, 734, 736 for controlling the processor 710. Other hardware or software modules are contemplated. The storage device 730 can be connected to the system bus 705. In one aspect, a hardware module that performs a particular function can include the software component stored in a computer-readable medium in connection with the necessary hardware components, such as the processor 710, bus 705, display 735, and so forth, to carry out the function.

FIG. 7B illustrates an example computer system 750 having a chipset architecture that can be used in executing the described method and generating and displaying a graphical user interface (GUI). Computer system 750 is an example of computer hardware, software, and firmware that can be used to implement the disclosed technology. System 750 can include a processor 755, representative of any number of physically and/or logically distinct resources capable of executing software, firmware, and hardware configured to perform identified computations. Processor 755 can communicate with a chipset 760 that can control input to and output from processor 755. In this example, chipset 760 outputs information to output device 765, such as a display, and can read and write information to storage device 770, which can include magnetic media, and solid state media, for example. Chipset 760 can also read data from and write data to RAM 775. A bridge 780 for interfacing with a variety of user interface components 785 can be provided for interfacing with chipset 760. Such user interface components 785 can include a keyboard, a microphone, touch detection and processing circuitry, a pointing device, such as a mouse, and so on. In general, inputs to system 750 can come from any of a variety of sources, machine generated and/or human generated.

Chipset 760 can also interface with one or more communication interfaces 790 that can have different physical interfaces. Such communication interfaces can include interfaces for wired and wireless local area networks, for broadband wireless networks, as well as personal area networks. Some applications of the methods for generating, displaying, and using the GUI disclosed herein can include receiving ordered datasets over the physical interface or be generated by the machine itself by processor 755 analyzing data stored in storage 770 or 775. Further, the machine can receive inputs from a user via user interface components 785 and execute appropriate functions, such as browsing functions by interpreting these inputs using processor 755.

It can be appreciated that example systems 700 and 750 can have more than one processor 710 or be part of a group or cluster of computing devices networked together to provide greater processing capability. In one aspect, reference to a “processor” can mean a group of processors of the same or different types. For example, the “processor” can include a central processing unit and a graphical processing unit. The “processor” can include one or multiple virtual and/or hardware processors.

For clarity of explanation, in some instances the present technology may be presented as including individual functional blocks including functional blocks comprising devices, device components, steps or routines in a method embodied in software, or combinations of hardware and software.

In some embodiments the computer-readable storage devices, mediums, and memories can include a cable or wireless signal containing a bit stream and the like. However, when mentioned, non-transitory computer-readable storage media expressly exclude media such as energy, carrier signals, electromagnetic waves, and signals per se.

Methods according to the above-described examples can be implemented using computer-executable instructions that are stored or otherwise available from computer readable media. Such instructions can comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause or otherwise configure a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Portions of computer resources used can be accessible over a network. The computer executable instructions may be, for example, binaries, intermediate format instructions such as assembly language, firmware, or source code. Examples of computer-readable media that may be used to store instructions, information used, and/or information created during methods according to described examples include magnetic or optical disks, flash memory, USB devices provided with non-volatile memory, networked storage devices, and so on.

Devices implementing methods according to these disclosures can comprise hardware, firmware and/or software, and can take any of a variety of form factors. Typical examples of such form factors include laptops, smart phones, small form factor personal computers, personal digital assistants, rackmount devices, standalone devices, and so on. Functionality described herein also can be embodied in peripherals or add-in cards. Such functionality can also be implemented on a circuit board among different chips or different processes executing in a single device, by way of further example.

The instructions, media for conveying such instructions, computing resources for executing them, and other structures for supporting such computing resources are means for providing the functions described in these disclosures.

Although a variety of examples and other information was used to explain aspects within the scope of the appended claims, no limitation of the claims should be implied based on particular features or arrangements in such examples, as one of ordinary skill would be able to use these examples to derive a wide variety of implementations. Further and although some subject matter may have been described in language specific to examples of structural features and/or method steps, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to these described features or acts. For example, such functionality can be distributed differently or performed in components other than those identified herein. Rather, the described features and steps are disclosed as examples of components of systems and methods within the scope of the appended claims. Moreover, claim language reciting “at least one of” a set indicates that one member of the set or multiple members of the set satisfy the claim.

It should be understood that features or configurations herein with reference to one embodiment or example can be implemented in, or combined with, other embodiments or examples herein. That is, terms such as “embodiment”, “variation”, “aspect”, “example”, “configuration”, “implementation”, “case”, and any other terms which may connote an embodiment, as used herein to describe specific features or configurations, are not intended to limit any of the associated features or configurations to a specific or separate embodiment or embodiments, and should not be interpreted to suggest that such features or configurations cannot be combined with features or configurations described with reference to other embodiments, variations, aspects, examples, configurations, implementations, cases, and so forth. In other words, features described herein with reference to a specific example (e.g., embodiment, variation, aspect, configuration, implementation, case, etc.) can be combined with features described with reference to another example. Precisely, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that the various embodiments or examples described herein, and their associated features, can be combined with each other.

A phrase such as an “aspect” does not imply that such aspect is essential to the subject technology or that such aspect applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to an aspect may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. A phrase such as an aspect may refer to one or more aspects and vice versa. A phrase such as a “configuration” does not imply that such configuration is essential to the subject technology or that such configuration applies to all configurations of the subject technology. A disclosure relating to a configuration may apply to all configurations, or one or more configurations. A phrase such as a configuration may refer to one or more configurations and vice versa. The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example or illustration.” Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs.

Moreover, claim language reciting “at least one of” a set indicates that one member of the set or multiple members of the set satisfy the claim. For example, claim language reciting “at least one of A, B, and C” or “at least one of A, B, or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: associating reputation scores with policies, stacks and hosts within a network, wherein the reputation scores are based at least in part on data received from a first capturing agent at a physical layer in a network, a second capturing agent at a hypervisor layer in the network, and a third capturing agent at a virtual layer of the network; upon receiving information about a newly provisioned entity, recommending a policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity that will result in a particular reputation score of the reputation scores; and implementing the policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising, when the particular reputation score of the newly provisioned entity falls below a threshold amount, isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: after isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network, analyzing traffic from other hosts similar to the newly provisioned entity with increased scrutiny.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network further comprises removing the newly provisioned entity from the network.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein multiple policies result in the particular reputation score.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein, when the multiple policies result in the particular reputation score, the policy scheme that is recommended comprises a least restrictive policy of the multiply policies.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the newly provisioned entity comprises one of a host and a stack.
 8. A system comprising: a processor; and a computer-readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising: associating reputation scores with policies, stacks and hosts within a network, wherein the reputation scores are based at least in part on data received from a first capturing agent at a physical layer in a network, a second capturing agent at a hypervisor layer in the network, and a third capturing device at a virtual layer of the network; upon receiving information about a newly provisioned entity, recommending a policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity that will result in a particular reputation score of the reputation scores; and implementing the policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity.
 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores further instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising further comprising: when the particular reputation score of the newly provisioned entity falls below a threshold amount, isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network.
 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores further instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising further comprising: after isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network, analyzing traffic from other hosts similar to the newly provisioned entity with increased scrutiny.
 11. The system of claim 8, wherein isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network further comprises removing the newly provisioned entity from the network.
 12. The system of claim 8, wherein multiple policies result in the particular reputation score.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein, when the multiple policies result in the particular reputation score, the policy scheme that is recommended comprises a least restrictive policy of the multiply policies.
 14. The system of claim 8, wherein the newly provisioned entity comprises one of a host and a stack.
 15. A computer-readable storage device storing instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising: associating reputation scores with policies, stacks and hosts within a network, wherein the reputation scores are based at least in part on data received from a first capturing agent at a physical layer in a network, a second capturing agent at a hypervisor layer in the network, and a third capturing device at a virtual layer of the network; upon receiving information about a newly provisioned entity, recommending a policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity that will result in a particular reputation score of the reputation scores; and implementing the policy scheme for the newly provisioned entity.
 16. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein the computer-readable storage device stores further instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising further comprising: when the particular reputation score of the newly provisioned entity falls below a threshold amount, isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network.
 17. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein the computer-readable storage device stores further instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising further comprising: after isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network, analyzing traffic from other hosts similar to the newly provisioned entity with increased scrutiny.
 18. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein isolating the newly provisioned entity from the network further comprises removing the newly provisioned entity from the network.
 19. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, wherein multiple policies result in the particular reputation score.
 20. The computer-readable storage device of claim 19, wherein, when the multiple policies result in the particular reputation score, the policy scheme that is recommended comprises a least restrictive policy of the multiply policies. 